A picure perfect example of Tanjug Newspeak 
 
 
Another Yugoslav army unit ordered to pull out of Kosovo-Metohija May 18, 1999 
 
 
BELGRADE, May 17 (Tanjug) - In line with the Yugoslav Supreme Command's decision to pull out some of the army and police effectives from Kosovo-Metohija, the Pristina Corps commander has ordered another unit to prepare and start withdrawing to its garrison outside that province of the Yugoslav republic of Serbia. 
 
 
Serbian Radio and Television quoted Pristina Corps Commander Gen. Vladimir Lazarevic as saying on Monday that the operation against the ethnic Albanian terrorists ended in late April in a defeat for the terrorists, establishing stable security in the province.  
 
 
This has made unnecessary the further presence of a part of the effectives of the Pristina Corps there, prompting the Supreme Command's decision of May 9 to pull some of them out, Lazarevic said. 
 
 
"Since that day, the Pristina Corps has been engaged in a specific operation of returning part of its forces to barracks outside the province," he explained. 
 
 
He added, however, that NATO is continuing its daily savage air strikes, now in their 55th day, targetting mainly civilians - towns and villages in Kosovo-Metohija. 
 
Zoja
As usual my posts are comming from the US or UK 
sources; this one (just to inform ignorant americans and others) is from the UK newspaper, which is 
one of the leading one: 
 
 http://www.independent.co.uk/stories/B1905911.html  
 
By David Usborne in New York 
 
AMERICA IS not a nation of geographers. After the Chinese embassy in Belgrade was hit by missiles because intelligence stuff used out-of-date maps, we now learn that the US Postal Service cannot locate the Grand Canyon. 
 
A new series of 60-cent stamps - 100 million of tham - have just left the presses. They show the world's largest and most famous hole in the 
ground alongside three words, printed in the lower right hand corner, 
"Grand Canyon, Colorado". 
 
As almoust any (!?) American schoolchild will tell you, the Canyon, though carved by the Colorado river, is in Arizona. 
 
In Colorado, at least? they are amused. The Governor of the state, Bill Owens, remarked through a spokesman: " Colorado already has so many national treasures that we would not want to steal the only one Arizona has to offer." 
 
The cost of printing the stamps, now likely to be ditched, is put at $500,000(£310,000).
A more sinister precaution is the statement issued by NATO that it 
                    cannot guarantee the security of Red Cross and UN aid workers who 
                    are returning to Kosovo this week after being evacuated when the 
                    bombing campaign began. Admitting that there had already been 
                    “perhaps hundreds of innocent casualties” from the bombing, a NATO 
                    spokesmen suggested that Red Cross and UN workers, too, could 
                    become collateral damage. 
 
                    Here is expressed both the real indifference of the imperialists to the 
                    suffering of the Albanian population which remains in Kosovo, and their 
                    concern that UN and Red Cross workers may report conditions far 
                    different from those claimed in NATO propaganda and parroted, for the 
                    most part, in the American media.
Should I post the whole article? 
 
From the (American site)  
 http://www.wsws.org  
 
 
Further doubt cast on US claims of 
                    genocide in Kosovo 
 
                    By Martin McLaughlin 
                    18 May 1999 
 
                    There are growing questions about the claims by US and NATO 
                    officials, accepted uncritically in the media for more than a month, that 
                    Yugoslav forces have carried out genocide against the Albanian 
                    population of Kosovo. 
 
                    These claims have been intensified in the wake of recent bombing 
                    atrocities such as the destruction of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade and 
                    the killing of as many as 100 Albanian Kosovars by NATO bombs in the 
                    village of Korisa. 
 
                    In an effort to excuse their own crimes, US and British officials in 
                    particular have repeatedly compared the actions of Serbian forces to the 
                    Nazi Holocaust. 
 
                    British Prime Minister Tony Blair, in a speech in Aachen, German May 
                    13, called the bombing campaign “a just war against the most evil form of 
                    genocide since my father's generation defeated the Nazis." 
 
                    Hillary Clinton, during a visit to Kosovar Albanian refugees in 
                    Macedonia, said their suffering reminded her of Schindler's List and 
                    Sophie's Choice, both of which concern the Nazi mass murder of the 
                    Jews. 
 
                    US Secretary of Defense William Cohen, speaking on a television 
                    interview program Sunday, dismissed Yugoslav criticism of the bombing 
                    of Korisa, in which 100 Kosovar Albanians were killed, declaring: “For 
                    the Serbs to lament publicly about the deaths of these refugees is almost 
                    tantamount to Adolf Eichmann complaining about allied forces bombing 
                    the crematoriums.” 
 
                    And finally President Clinton himself, in a speech May 13 to an audience 
                    of veterans in Washington DC. Clinton admitted that the whole premise 
                    of the NATO propaganda campaign against the Milosevic regime was 
                    false, that “ethnic cleansing is not the same as the ethnic extermination of 
                    the Holocaust.” But then he reiterated the claim that “There are 
                    thousands of people that have been killed, systematically, by the Serb 
                    forces. There are a hundred thousand people who are still missing." 
 
                    None of these sweeping assertions was accompanied by any evidence, 
                    such as aerial photographs and other documentation which could be 
                    provided by the massive electronic and satellite surveillance which the US 
                    intelligence services maintain over Kosovo. 
 
                    Instead, the US-NATO claims were undermined by a dispatch published 
                    May 17 from an eyewitness on the ground, Canadian journalist Paul 
                    Watson, the correspondent for the Los Angeles Times in Kosovo. 
 
                    While the Clinton administration claims that 100,000 Albanian men have 
                    disappeared and are likely dead, murdered by the Yugoslav military and 
                    Serbian nationalists, Watson found many young Albanian men, displaced 
                    but otherwise unmolested, at the village of Svetjle in northern Kosovo. 
 
                    Svetjle is one of the Kosovo Albanian villages that, according to NATO, 
                    has been depopulated by Serb forces who committed genocide. While 
                    NATO Secretary-General Javier Solana said that Serbian killings of 
                    Albanians had been so widespread that “you don't see males in their 30s 
                    to 60s,” Watson had no difficulty seeing them. 
 
                    When he arrived at Svetjle for a second visit in a week, “hundreds of 
                    young men are everywhere, strolling along the dirt roads or lying on grass 
                    on a spring day. 
 
                    “So many fighting-age men in a region where the Kosovo Liberation 
                    Army fought some of its fiercest battles against Serbian forces are a 
                    challenge to the black-and-white versions of what is happening here. 
 
                    “By their own accounts, the men are not living in a concentration camp, 
                    nor being forced to labor for the police or army, nor serving as human 
                    shields for Serbs. 
 
                    “Instead, they are waiting with their families for permission to follow 
                    thousands who have risked going back home to nearby villages because 
                    they do not want to give up and leave Kosovo.” 
 
                    Watson visited the village without a police or military escort or any 
                    official Serbian monitor, and he spoke to Albanian refugees who 
                    themselves said they had not had any conflicts with the police since they 
                    were allowed to return to the area around their village. 
 
                    “For the month that we've been here, the police have come only to sell 
                    cigarettes,” one Albanian said, “but there hasn't been any harassment.” 
 
                    While the American media continues to give publicity to increasingly 
                    unbelievable estimates that more than 90 percent of the Kosovo Albanian 
                    population has been driven from their homes, Watson describes a 
                    population that went into hiding during the first two weeks of the NATO 
                    bombing, but is now emerging.. 
 
                    He writes: “Thousands of other ethnic Albanians are coming out of hiding 
                    in forests and in the mountains, hungry and frightened and either going 
                    back home or waiting for police permission to do so. 
 
                    “While Serbian police seize the identity documents of Kosovo Albanians 
                    crossing the border into Albania or Macedonia, government officials in 
                    Pristina, Kosovo's provincial capital, issue new identity cards to ethnic 
                    Albanians still here.” 
 
                    Watson interviewed an Albanian political activist, Fatmir Seholi of the 
                    Kosovo Democratic Initiative, who denied the allegations of genocide 
                    against Albanians which have been the principal pretext for the NATO 
                    bombing. 
 
                    “As an Albanian, I am convinced that the Serbian government and 
                    security forces are not committing any kind of genocide,” he said. 
 
                    “In a war, even innocent people die,” he explained. “In every war, there 
                    are those who want to profit. Here there is a minority of people who 
                    wanted to steal, but that's not genocide. These are only crimes.” 
 
                    Seholi is a political opponent of the separatist Kosovo Liberation Army, 
                    which killed his father in 1997 and publicly justified it on the grounds of 
                    cooperation with the Yugoslav authorities. But it is significant that Watson 
                    himself, who has been in Kosovo throughout the war, gives the same 
                    description of the attacks by Serb nationalists on the Albanian 
                    population, and their eventual end. 
 
                    “After waves of looting, arson, killings and other attacks turned many of 
                    Kosovo's cities into virtual ghost towns, the government took steps to 
                    restore order, and ethnic Albanians began to move back, often under 
                    police protection,” he writes. 
 
                    “Of an estimated 100,000 people living in Pristina, roughly 80,000 are 
                    ethnic Albanians and a quarter of these are displaced people from the 
                    Podujevo area living with relatives...” 
 
                    Watson's report is thus in stark contrast with the statements of Clinton, 
                    Blair & Co., alleging systematic, ongoing mass murder by the Yugoslav 
                    government. It follows a similar series of reports published earlier this 
                    month in the New York Times. 
 
                    These reports suggest that the claims of genocide in Kosovo, which have 
                    provided the essential pretext for the NATO bombing, are a deliberate 
                    and enormous hoax. This attempt to delude and stampede public opinion 
                    will be exposed with devastating political consequences for its authors 
                    once it becomes possible for outside observers to make a more 
                    systematic assessment of the conditions in Kosovo. 
 
                    The Clinton administration is already making preparations to counter such 
                    exposures. The White House announced that it has hired a public 
                    relations coordinator for the Kosovo refugee campaign, veteran political 
                    operative Leslie Dach, to work on a 30-day contract. One White House 
                    official told the press, "There's a feeling that the next month is critical in 
                    terms of American public opinion." 
 
                    A more sinister precaution is the statement issued by NATO that it 
                    cannot guarantee the security of Red Cross and UN aid workers who 
                    are returning to Kosovo this week after being evacuated when the 
                    bombing campaign began. Admitting that there had already been 
                    “perhaps hundreds of innocent casualties” from the bombing, a NATO 
                    spokesmen suggested that Red Cross and UN workers, too, could 
                    become collateral damage. 
 
                    Here is expressed both the real indifference of the imperialists to the 
                    suffering of the Albanian population which remains in Kosovo, and their 
                    concern that UN and Red Cross workers may report conditions far 
                    different from those claimed in NATO propaganda and parroted, for the 
                    most part, in the American media. 
 
                    See Also: 
                    After Korisa bomb atrocity 
                    The evolution of a NATO lie 
                    [17 May 1999] 
                    An interview with Professor Robert Hayden 
                    NATO's claim of 100,000 murdered in Kosovo--a rebuttal 
                    [17 May 1999] 
                    What really has happened in Kosovo 
                    [14 May 1999] 
                    War in the Balkans 
                    [WSWS Full Coverage] 
 
                                            Top of page 
 
                           Readers: The WSWS invites your comments. Please send e-mail.
To Ciuldo: 
 
"All other opinions except Guido's, Emina's, Jack's, Zoja's, DS's, Pete's and Rosies' are null and void due to the fact that their authors lack the necessary insight and intelligence required to discern reality from propaganda." 
 
So why do you participate in that messageboard? If you don`t care about other`s opinions -use e-mail to communicate with your "comrades". And, BTW, I lived in USSR, and I know, how we treated our propaganda. We at least knew, that was propaganda. And made no trust to it. And if we were so brainwashed, how could we even think to change anything, eh? Too many west people seem to be unable to recognize their own propaganda - too sad... 
 
 
"P.S. NATO is kicking butt and not losing. There have been no bombs dropped on my city. Nothing in my country has been damaged" 
Well, it doesn`t matter. Vietnam War was lost not due high losses. It was, militarily, hopeless - hostile population, rough terrain, jungle... Just like Serbia (except jungle). So, NATO isn`t losing - but isn`t winning. Morally, NATO allready lost that war, becouse it`s poinless. For many reasons. Actually, NATO can fall apart after the war.
"America and the world 
 
                    Every day the American government is murdering people in one country 
                    or another. On Wednesday, US warplanes bombed a Bedouin 
                    encampment in northern Iraq, killing 12 people, two of them children. 
                    The nomadic herdsmen were hit by laser-guided bombs which also killed 
                    200 head of cattle. The US command at Incirlik, Turkey claimed that US 
                    jets had bombed seven missile sites after they were targeted by Iraqi 
                    radar. 
 
                    The increasingly aggressive and reckless use of military power is 
                    contributing to a radical change in how the United States is seen around 
                    the world. The most spectacular expression has come in the mass 
                    anti-American protests in China. But there are more and more 
                    expressions of concern, even from sources long friendly to the American 
                    political establishment, about the direction of American foreign policy. 
 
                    Human Rights Watch, a New York-based group frequently allied with 
                    the US State Department, sent a letter May 13 to NATO 
                    Secretary-General Javier Solana, raising "serious concerns about whether 
                    NATO is targeting civilian objects," including hospitals, power plants, 
                    media facilities and factories unrelated to military production. 
 
                    A columnist in the Los Angeles Times--a professor of international law 
                    in that city--warned that NATO officials, military officers and even 
                    ordinary soldiers could be prosecuted by a UN war crimes tribunal 
                    which has jurisdiction over crimes such as "wanton destruction of cities, 
                    towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity." 
 
                    The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson, on a 
                    visit to Yugoslavia, publicly criticized the conduct of the NATO bombing 
                    campaign, calling the civilian casualties "extremely high." NATO 
                    warplanes dropped anti-personnel cluster bombs on Nis while Robinson 
                    was riding through the city. Two schools were hit and at least a dozen 
                    people were wounded." 
 
 
wsws.org
The Orwellian language of war 
                  
               "In times of war, 
               truth is the  
               first casualty" 
                                   
 
                                                                By Norman Solomon 
                                                              SPECIAL TO MSNBC 
 
                 
 
 
When terrorists attack us, they’re villains. When 
               we attack them, we’re retaliating. That’s an easy 
               example of the doublespeak heard from 
               government and the media when a nation goes to 
               war. In this excerpt from “The Habits of Highly 
               Deceptive Media,” Norman Solomon, takes a 
               lesson from George Orwell to explain the logic of 
               war reporting. 
 
 
       When people decry civilian deaths caused by the U.S. 
                         government, they’re aiding propaganda efforts. In sharp 
                         contrast, when civilian deaths are caused by bombers who 
                         hate America, the perpetrators are evil and those deaths are 
                         tragedies. 
                                When they put bombs in cars and kill people, they’re 
                         uncivilized killers. When we put bombs on missiles and kill 
                         people, we’re upholding civilized values. 
                                When they kill, they’re terrorists. When we kill, we’re 
                         striking against terror. 
 
 
KEEPING HATREDS STRAIGHT 
                                At all times, Americans must be kept fully informed 
                         about who to hate and fear. When the United States found 
                         Osama bin Laden useful during the 1980s because of his 
                         tenacious violence against the Soviet occupiers in 
                         Afghanistan, he was good, or at least not bad-but now he’s 
                         really bad. 
                                No matter how many times they’ve lied in the past, 
                         U.S. officials are credible in the present. When they vaguely 
                         cite evidence that the bombed pharmaceutical factory in 
                         Khartoum was making ingredients for nerve gas, that should 
                         be good enough for us.  
         Advertisement 
 
 
        The Habits of Highly 
        Deceptive Media: 
        Decoding Spin and 
        Lies in Mainstream 
        by Norman Solomon 
 
        Other books by 
        Norman Solomon 
 
 
                                Might doesn’t make right-except in the real world, 
                         when it’s American might. Only someone of dubious 
                         political orientation would split hairs about international law. 
                                When the mass media in some foreign countries serve 
                         as megaphones for the rhetoric of their government, the 
                         result is ludicrous propaganda. When the mass media in our 
                         country serve as megaphones for the rhetoric of the U.S. 
                         government, the result is responsible journalism. 
                                Unlike the TV anchors spouting the government line in 
                         places like Sudan and Afghanistan, ours don’t have to be 
                         told what to say. They have the freedom to report as they 
                         choose. BUT: 
                                 
                         LESSONS FROM ORWELL 
                                “Circus dogs jump when the trainer cracks his whip,” 
                         George Orwell observed, “but the really well-trained dog is 
                         the one that turns his somersault when there is no whip.” 
                                Orwell noted that language “becomes ugly and 
                         inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the 
                         slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have 
                         foolish thoughts.” And his novel 1984 explained that “the 
                         special function of certain Newspeak words ... was not so 
                         much to express meanings as to destroy them.” 
                                National security. Western values. The world 
                         community. War against terrorism. Collateral damage. 
                         American interests. 
                                What’s so wondrous about Orwellian processes is that 
                         they tend to be very well camouflaged — part of the normal 
                         scenery. Day in and day out, we take them for granted. And 
                         we’re apt to stay away from uncharted mental paths. 
************************      In 1984, Orwell wrote about the conditioned reflex of 
                         “stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any 
                         dangerous thought ... and of being bored or repelled by any 
                         train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical 
                         direction.”******** 
                                 
                         DOUBLETHINK DEFINED  
     
 
                                Orwell described “doublethink” as the willingness “to 
                         forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, 
                         when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from 
                         oblivion for just so long as it is needed.” 
                                In his afterword to 1984, Erich Fromm emphasized 
                         “the point which is essential for the understanding of 
                         Orwell’s book, namely that ‘doublethink’ is already with us, 
                         and not merely something which will happen in the future, 
                         and in dictatorships.” 
                                Fifty-three years ago, Orwell wrote an essay titled 
                         “Politics and the English Language.” Today, his words 
                         remain as relevant as ever: “In our time, political speech and 
                         writing are largely the defense of the indefensible.” 
                                Repression and atrocities “can indeed be defended,” 
                         Orwell added, “but only by arguments which are too brutal 
                         for most people to face, and which do not square with the 
                         professed aims of political parties. Thus political language 
                         has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and 
                         sheer cloudy vagueness.” 
                                National security. Western values. The world 
                         community. War against terrorism. Collateral damage. 
                         American interests. 
                                 
                                 
 
                         Media critic Norman Solomon is an author of books, 
                         including “The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media: 
                         Decoding Spin and Lies in Mainstream News” and “The 
                         Trouble With Dilbert: How Corporate Culture Gets the 
                         Last Laugh,” both published by Common Courage Press. 
                         He is a contributor to MSNBC.
May 17, 1999 
                                  WHAT IS A CLUSTER BOMB?  
 
   
                      
                         
   
                    WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon has acknowledged using cluster 
                    bombs in the air war against Yugoslavia. Some researchers are 
                    condemning the use of this weapon. Among those available for interviews 
                    are:  
 
                     KEVIN KAVANAUGH, [email protected], www.fas.org  
                    A research scientist specializing in defense affairs at the Federation of 
                    American Scientists, Kavanaugh said: "Cluster bomb units -- CBU-87/B, 
                    combined effects munitions, are 1,000-pound deadly munitions that 
                    break into 202 bomblets, and each bomblet fractures into 300 fragments 
                    of steel. It covers a football field, it can turn an apple orchard into apple 
                    sauce -- or people into hamburger. It's used against 'soft targets,' 
                    meaning troops and [other] people, though it can go through light armor 
                    to a certain point... Unexploded munitions are also a concern, the 
                    bomblets are yellow, with a little white umbrella, they're very attractive to 
                    children. That's one more reason to oppose their use."  
 
                     MICHAEL KLARE, [email protected]  
                    Professor of Peace and World Security Studies at Hampshire College in 
                    Massachusetts and author of Rogue States and Nuclear Outlaws, Klare 
                    said: "Demonstrating the poverty of the NATO strategy in the Balkans is 
                    the use of Vietnam-era cluster bomb weapons which are sure to produce 
                    high levels of civilian casualties because of their inherent nature -- that is, 
                    as anti-personnel weapons. So much for a surgical air war."  
 
                     STEVE GOOSE, @hrw.org">gooses@hrw.org, www.hrw.org  
                    Program director of the arms division of Human Rights Watch, Goose 
                    said: "The submunitions inside cluster bombs have a high failure rate and 
                    can leave unexploded ordnance across wide areas, ready to detonate on 
                    contact, in effect becoming landmines and killing civilians even years after 
                    the conflict has ended. Because of the submunitions' appearance-- some 
                    are orange-yellow soda-can sized objects -- children are particularly 
                    drawn to the volatile live remnants. On April 24, five children playing with 
                    colorful unexploded submunitions were reported killed, and two injured, 
                    near Doganovic in southern Kosovo. We condemn their use. NATO 
                    should stop using them immediately."  
 
 
                    For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy: Sam 
                    Husseini, (202) 347-0020; David Zupan, (541) 484-9167
 http://www.peaceinbalkans.freeserve.co.uk/  
 
 
As NATO splits deepen parliament is again 
 denied a vote  
 News release Wednesday 19 May 1999  
 
    
 
 The Committee for Peace in the Balkans pointed out today that, despite growing political and public unease over NATO's bombing 
 of Yugoslavia, the House of Commons was yesterday once again denied the right to vote and express its view on the military action. 
 
 When asked by Tony Benn MP if parliament was to be allowed to vote, the Leader of the Commons, Margaret Beckett, replied that 
 this was not possible because the result 'might cast doubt on our support for our troops in the field.'  
 
 Tony Benn MP said: 'Britain is increasingly isolated in demanding ground troops and refusing to go to the United Nations. This came 
 out clearly in yesterday's debate in parliament where once again the House of Commons was denied a vote. With German 
 Chancellor Gerhard Schroder stating that a land invasion is unthinkable and only 15 per cent of people in the United States in favour 
 of sending ground troops in now, the need to start negotiations to find a political solution is greater than ever. It is essential that 
 parliament is allowed to express its view on behalf of the people it represents by voting on the course being pursued towards 
 Yugoslavia. It appears from yesterday's debate that the government wishes to avoid a vote for fear that the result may not be to their 
 liking.'  
 
 Alice Mahon MP said: 'The widespread and cross-bench disquiet over NATO's military action in Yugoslavia expressed in 
 yesterday's debate underlines the growing international calls for bombing to cease and opposition to a ground invasion. A ground 
 invasion was dismissed as an option by a new and broad range of MPs. It is unthinkable that the Prime Minister could commit 
 Britain to sending ground troops into Yugoslavia without a vote in the House.' 
 
      Thursday 20 May, 6.30pm: Call for Truth from the Ministry of Lies. Protest for media accuracy, at the Ministry of Defence, Whitehall. 
      Journalists and media workers will protest against NATO's pressure on media to report its claims uncritically and will express opposition to 
      NATO bombing media outlets in Yugoslavia.  
      Sunday 23 May: Bring Peace to Yugoslavia. A benefit concert for the Committee for Peace in the Balkans. With Jeremy Hardy, John 
      Hegley, Linda Smith, Germaine Greer, Maggie Steed, Junior Simpson, Seddik Sebiri, Tony Benn MP, Diane Abbott MP and others. 
      Hackney Empire, Mare St, London E8. Doors 6.30pm; starts 7.30pm. Box office 0181-985 2424.
Notice how brilliant posts from Maja and Daniela are. And then you have got Zoja's. They all start with "US say" or "NATO say", that is why she expects everyone to believe their contents. 
 
Since we all agree by now that NATO = USA, that UN = 0.00, Albania + NATO media = Serbs are Monsters, how can anyone trust anything starting with "NATO say" or equivalent ? 
 
Serbian propaganda ? I don't know about some of you, but I log on to some of their sites every day and they always report damage and casualties, first denied and then acknowledged by NATO under the pressure of television (which is why they bomb it daily). 
 
If this is all Serb propaganda, then what are UK, USA, Italian, French, Swiss, Germany, Spain, Russia and Greece media doing reporting information accusing NATO of leading a pointless war, including killing civilians (Serbs and Albanians), ruining a country's infrastructure, destroying the ecological system, driving hundreds of thousands away from home, dropping unused bombs off the Italian coast ? 
 
You tell me because most of these countries are part of NATO, I think. 
 
You tell me. 
 
Tell me EXACTLY WHY the Independent, The Guardian, The Observer, The Express, The Washington Post and Times, The New York Post, MSNBC news, LM Marxism, WSWS, RaiUno, Antenne 2, TV5, Il Giornale, La Vanguardia, TV3, Canal Plus, Telecinco, BBC, Itar-Tass, Athens Antenna, Athinaiki, TruthInMedia, and many others ALL REPORT REGULARLY INFORMATION DIRECTLY IMPLICATING NATO LYING, IMPLYING ILLEGAL ACTIONS TAKEN BY THEM IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE, NO MATTER WHAT, THEIR FINAL GOAL: CONQUER KOSOVO. 
 
The above media are located in countries contained in the list mentioned further up.
To Nick. 
 
All sounds briliantly high levelled, BUT..... you failed the test! 
 
Zoja 
 
ps Didn't you see the other sources than the ones you mentoined. Guess not. Buy some specs!
The mighty Russian Army defending Yugoslavia. Let them do it, then see in September what happens!! 
 
RUSSIAN COMPUTERS NOT READY FOR MILLENIUM. Acting Deputy 
Prime Minister Bulgak told government officials on 18 May 
that some essential Russian computer networks may begin to 
experience failures as early as 9 September unless resolute 
measures are taken to prepare for the so-called millennium 
computer bug problem, "RIA-Novosti" reported. According to 
the agency, Bulgak accused the Economics Ministry of the 
worst performance among all government agencies in this 
regard. He pointed to the ministry's inadequate efforts to 
prepare industrial enterprises. Other agencies singled out 
for censure were the Federal Energy Commission and the 
State Committees for Cartography and Environmental 
Protection. 
 
Sergey, Basil, go look for an American provider! 
 
Zoja
Hey, Nickyboy, here's something your beloved Tanjug did not tell you.... 
 
FIRST BIG ANTI-WAR PROTESTS IN SERBIA. At least 3,000 people 
in Krusevac and a similar number in Aleksandrovac 
demonstrated on 17 May for the return of Yugoslav soldiers 
from Kosova, RFE/RL's South Slavic Service reported. Many of 
the protesters were relatives of soldiers and carried signs 
with slogans such as "We want our boys and not their 
coffins." The following day in London, British Defense 
Secretary George Robertson said that, "Yesterday there was a 
crack that appeared in the facade of the Yugoslav regime." In 
Krusevac, the Yugoslav army issued a statement saying that 
the protests there took place on 17 and 18 May. The statement 
charged that unnamed persons took advantage of soldiers' 
parents' feelings in order to promote "treason, undermine the 
defense of the country, and [promote] direct collaboration 
with the enemy." The statement added that the organizers will 
be prosecuted.  Observers noted that the demonstrations were 
the first large ones against Belgrade's policies in Kosova to 
be reported since the NATO air strikes began in March.  
 
Zoja
Zoja, you did not answer my question: 
 
You tell me why these media are talking AGAINST NATO. 
 
You tell me. 
 
There is no test. 
 
Buy a brain.